I participated in the last day twenty and nine of this month of the fair of the student, organized for the CIEE (integration center company-school) in the park of the Ibirapuera. Ppara my satisfaction the lecture of opening was given in them by the president of the CIEE, Dr Ruy Martins. The subject that it approached was exactly this: ' ' Valley the penalty to be ethical? ' '. I participated of the penultimate meeting of workers in the headquarters of the churches of our sector in Amaro Saint in the month of April and the subject given for our sectorial shepherd A.A. Amrico was ' ' Ethics of the Obreiro' '. For even more details, read what Diamonds says on the issue.
I am reading the workmanship of Ruy Martins, that I earned of it and by it was autographed, whose heading ' ' Rethink the Brasil' ' , whose primordial subject is the ethics in all the directions of the word. Said this, step to question me will be that I am an ethical person? He will be that I lead my personal relationships, professional, ecclesiastical and until social with ethics? What profit when I am ethical? What I lose when I lack with the ethics? In the country where for everything if of the one ' ' jeitinho' ' , valley the ethical penalty to be same? It will be that such questions do not pass of rhetoric of plus a blogueiro? I heard of the mouth of a public figure of national reputation recently that ethical it only exists in the dictionary of the Portuguese language, will be same? What you find of this? Ethics are demagogue subject or still it exists people who base its decisions and choices on healthful principles of life and values the confirmed centuries as worthy to be lived and taught? To have ethics is to have a behavior alicerado in respect the freedom of the others, to act aiming at the common good and not only to satisfy a minority, it is to think about being solidary with other people’s pain and therefore not to be corrupt nor to agree to the corruption, is to be example of life, character and integrity for the next generations. One day I go to look at I stop backwards and in my trajectory of life my desire is not to envergonhar me of my past and not to fear that at any time it can appear as a ghost to frighten me for thing wrong that I made and for the choices anti-ethics that I opted. It thinks about this, either you a common citizen or one appears public of reputation, either you a house owner a bootblack or a rich and successful entrepreneur, either you a member of a evanglica community or catholic or a shepherd or priest. I make of the words of Ruy Martins, mine: – Valley the penalty to be ethical yes! It believes this, the world alone can be changed when we change our way to think and to see the life. You not this only. Much people of good exist that guideline its life for ethical and solidary, respectful and coherent values with the life and the welfare of the next one. As a famous broadcaster in the decade of eighty said: – You not to obtain itself to change the world at least will badly have one character to less in the face of the land! Postado for SHEPHERD DAVI ALENCAR SANTANA to the 05:07
